Shozy Stardust BK review: dust to dust

Shozy Stardust BK review

In-ear headphones make up the bulk of the earphones market nowadays, but earbuds are still out there. There are many different variations on the theme: the latest is the half in-ear, spearheaded by the Apple EarPods, but there are also many differences in tuning. The Shozy Stardust BK are “classic” in their looks and they sport a warm, bassy tuning that many surely will like. They’re quite unlike most earbuds that suffer from the fact of being completely open and have lacking bass. They’re a ton of fun, actually!

Disclaimer: I received this unit from Linsoul free of charge for the purpose of this review. They sell it for $189 on Amazon.

TL;DR: recap

Good build quality


Good bass extension

Low technical ability

Fatiguing upper midrange

Could use more accessories

Low quality/price ratio

Rating: 6.5/10

Packaging & Accessories

Shozy Stardust BK

Shozy is really consistent in how it packages its products: the Stardust BK come in a cardboard box which holds a hard case with the earphones inside. There are no accessories included but a pair of doughnut-shaped foams.

Design & Comfort

Shozy Stardust BK shell

Shozy decided to use an off-the-shelf shell and settled on the same shell used for the Yuin PK1 and the Linsoul BLD, among others. This choice is a good one as the shell is famously comfortable, light and well built. As it is the same shell as the one used on the BLD, I invite you to read the Linsoul BLD review for additional information.

The doughnut foams do a great job at making the earbuds more comfortable and in fact the Shozy Stardust BK are really comfortable even for prolonged listening sessions. The same is not entirely true when using them without the foams, as the hard plastic may cause a bit of discomfort after a while. As the earphones are really light, though, it will take a lot of time before they become fatiguing.

Shozy Stardust BK cable

The cable is really well-made, but it’s also really thin. There are eight thin cores woven tightly; they separate in two groups of four cores each after the Y-split, which is protected just by a bit of heat-shrink. This unusual solution helps keeping a clean look. There’s then a chin slider (which I mistakenly thought was the Y-split at first!) which seems a puck, made of rubbery plastic. The jack is protected by a metal housing with a heat-shrink strain relief. While the cable is really well made and good-looking, it is really thin and therefore seems a bit fragile.

Sound & Specs

I tried the Shozy Stardust BK using a Venture Electronics RunAbout 2.0bl driven by a Topping D30, an iFi xDSD and a Shanling M2X. The bulk of source files was made of FLAC files in 16 bit / 44.1 kHz. Tests were performed using the doughnut-shaped foams.

Shozy Stardust BK

Frequency response 10 – 20,000 Hz
Impedance 16 Ω
Sensitivity 105 dB


With just 16 Ω impedance and 105 dB sensitivity, the Shozy Stardust BK is driven like a breeze by any source, including DAPs and portable sources. In fact, using an attenuator may be necessary with many desktop amplifiers due to the low power requirements.

The open back usually leads to a wide and deep soundstage and the Shozy Stardust BK make (almost) no exception. The sound is large and spacious, as if it extended well beyond the inside of the head. It’s still not the widest I’ve heard in earbuds, but it’s very good. Imaging is alas not on par, as it is not really accurate and gives just general cues on the position of instruments. There’s no chance of being able to point at a specific place as the source of the sound, though this also creates a sort of echo effect that reinforces the sensation of large space. Instrument separation is capable of separating instrument with enough accuracy only in simple tracks; complex tracks will result in less clarity than ideal and more hodgepodge than ideal.

Bass is full and extended into sub-bass, though the open nature of the earbuds limits bass response to just tip its toes into sub-bass. 20 Hz is a distant mirage. Bass response is unexpectedly good anyway, so much so that it results in an overall warm response. Presence is mostly concentrated in the mid-bass area, as one would expect. There’s enough control not to let bass spill over mids, so the warmth does not degenerate in plain chaos. Despite the diaphragm being decently large (14.2 mm), it isn’t able to deliver the same sensation of impact as other earbuds. Bass is not slow, but it’s not really fast either. There’s some detail, but it’s not what I would call “excellent retrieval” – there’s just the basics.

Midrange seems to have a peak around the mid-upper region that gives it a bit of brightness – the fatiguing kind of brightness that makes brass instruments and electric guitars piercing and harsh. Curiously enough, this spike does not equate to midrange being perceived as bright: midrange is still tilted towards warmth, also thanks to bass being very present, but it has this fatiguing spike that does not really add anything to the signature as a whole. Clarity is overall decent, although complex tracks with lots of instruments will sound a bit jumbled. Detail is just sufficient and fails to deliver more nuanced sounds – something one would expect in earbuds in this price range.

Treble is present in the lower range, but then fades away pretty quickly. Roll off smashes extension pretty hard as it is quick and unforgiving. This is expected given the Shozy Stardust BK are earbuds, but a bit of additional presence in the upper area would surely have made them a bit more balanced. It would also have contributed in making the Stardust BK a bit more technical, as treble detail is decent but lacks the presence in the upper range.

Shozy Stardust BK Comparisons

Most of the earbuds I’ve tried so far are from Venture Electronics, so I’ll compare the Stardust BK mainly to VE products:

  • Venture Electronics Zen 2.0: the Zen 2.0 are more technical and more balanced than the Stardust BK. Their tuning does not have the same peaks of the Stardust BK and therefore appears more balanced and pleasant. Bass is similarly extended, but more controlled and less intrusive, also with more detail; midrange is devoid of odd peaks and therefore sounds more pleasant while being clearly warm; treble is slightly more extended, though by a small bit. Soundstage is comparably wide, but much deeper on the Zen 2.0. Imaging is more accurate, so one can place instruments on the stage better. Instrument separation is also better.
  • Venture Electronics Zen Lite: the Zen Lite are much less warm than the Stardust BK. Their bass is not as prominent, but this also leaves room for the midrange to shine, while being similarly extended. Midrange is a bit bright, yet not piercing or fatiguing like the Stardust BK. Treble has similar low extension. Detail is a bit better on the whole front, though. Soundstage is comparable in width, but deeper, while imaging is more accurate and instrument separation is slightly better.
  • Venture Electronics Asura 2.0s: the Asura 2.0s are definitely brighter than the Stardust BK, but their brightness is of a different kind and they aren’t as harsh as the Shozy. Bass is less extended and present, but still adequate to make the tuning balanced. Midrange is bright but enjoyable, as the added emphasis is gentle. Treble is much more present and extended than on the Shozy. Soundstage is larger and deeper, imaging is more accurate and instrument separation is better.

Final Thoughts

The Shozy Stardust BK are interesting earbuds if you are really after warmth coupled with a decently large soundstage. In basically all other cases they’re not able to really compete with other offerings on the market, especially if we take into account their technical ability. They’re frankly not good enough for the price they’re sold at. They’re over sufficiency only because their sound signature is still relatively balanced and coherent, with an overall pleasant outcome given the right genre. They would be great at half the price.

About Riccardo Robecchi

Living in Glasgow, Scotland but born and raised near Milan, Italy, I got the passion for music listening as a legacy from my father and my grandfather. I have reported on technology for major Italian publications since 2011.


    1. I’ll be posting about it in the coming days – I’ll explain the reason for the wait when I post the article!

  1. Totally agree on this review, I am ending up selling it in the end, since the image and soundstage are not that good. All in all it could be a deal breaker for the money I ask now (used), but full price… uhm… 🙂

Leave a Reply

Did you like the review? Let me know! Please note that you should write in English, as comments in other languages will be deleted. Thank you!


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.