Tenhz T5 review: charming

Tenhz T5 review

Does adding more balanced armatures to earphones always make them better? I don’t think so, yet the Tenhz T5 are actually really good with their whopping five drivers. Those five drivers are so good that they don’t make you long for earphones which are seemingly better equipped with a higher driver count. Tenhz’s line-up spans multiple driver counts, but the Tenhz T5 seem to hit the sweet spot.

Disclaimer: Linsoul Audio sent me a complimentary unit. They sell it on Amazon at $190.

TL;DR: recap


Warm, relaxing sound

Seriously, why is the right channel coloured in blue and the left in red?

Rating: 7.2/10

Packaging & Accessories

The Tenhz T5 comes with a nice set of accessories: in the box there are a cloth bag and a small plastic box with a set of eartips (three pairs of silicone tips and three pairs of foam tips).

Design & Comfort

Tenhz T5

The Tenhz T5’s shells are loosely triangular in shape, so that’s not what sets them apart. Colour is. The T5 are in fact made of transparent black resin, which partly shows the innards, with a peculiar glittery faceplate. Each faceplate has the Tenhz logo on it on a background of glitters which has its undeniable charm. There’s nothing really unique to the T5, but they are good looking.

There are various options available for the colour of the shells; the sample I received has left and right in different colours (for some incomprehensible reason right is blue, left is right), but there are other options which look better in my opinion. The faceplate is sparkling as it contains speckles of some shiny material. The effect is surely attractive, and it is quite different to those seen on the Toneking T88K, PMV Crescent 8BA and Shozy x Neo BG. Just like the Tenhz P4 Pro, the Tenhz T5 uses the MMCX standard for the removable cable.

Tenhz T5

The Tenhz T5 are very well built, with the shells being made of one single piece of resin that appears durable and the cable being well put assembled. My only concern is the MMCX connection, but that should not be a problem unless one keeps on stressing the connector by plugging the cable in and out.

The Tenhz T5 can stay in my ears for hours on end – the combination of a good cable and of well-shaped shells makes them especially comfortable. The resin shells deserve a special mention as they have an ergonomic shape, but for once I find it comfortable. That does not mean that everyone will, as the wearing experience is deeply personal, but the T5 should be comfortable to most people.

Isolation-wise, the Tenhz T5 are not the best you can find on the market, as they offer moderate isolation at best. Even when using foam tips the T5 can only reduce the volume of surrounding noise by a small margin. This makes them not especially useful on public transport and in other similarly noisy situations.

The cable is well-made and actually one of the best stock cables I’ve seen in the sub-$200 range. It has eight cores, four per channel, half of which are silver-plated, while the other half is pure copper. The cable as a whole is soft and malleable, and is also unexpectedly light. This may be in part thanks to the lightweight metallic elements (jack housing, Y-split, MMCX housings). The ear hook is made with relatively soft pre-moulded transparent plastic.

Sound & Specs

When testing the Tenhz T5 I used a Burson Audio Playmate when at the desk and a Shanling M2X while on the move. In the former case I also used an iFi IEMatch. Most of the music was in FLAC files in standard resolution (16 bit, 44.1 kHz).

Tenhz T5

Frequency response 20 – 20,000 Hz
Impedance 10 Ω
Sensitivity 120 dB


The Tenhz T5 use five balanced armatures, as their name suggests, which afford them a low impedance and a high sensitivity. They can be easily driven by any portable device and they definitely do not need any amplification (I mean, 10 Ω impedance and 120 dB sensitivity. You could drive these with a toaster).

The overall tonality is warm, with emphasised bass and lower mids that appear to be on top of everything else. They’re surely easy to listen to as this warmth is never invasive.

I would not describe soundstage as wide and spacious; it is instead more intimate and two-dimensional, extending from left to right but without presenting the listener with much in terms of depth or spatial cues that go beyond “left”, “centre” and “right”. That’s also because imaging is limited in its ability to place instruments on the stage. Instrument separation is fine, making instruments discernible in the mix with relative ease but never making them pop out as if it was playing alone.

Bass is typical of balanced armatures, being fast and controlled but not really physical nor deep. It is in fact prominent the middle section, with a bump that has a steep slope on the side facing lower frequencies. Depth is in fact limited and the Tenhz T5 can only reach down to about 50 Hz with enough strength to be audible. Control is good enough so that detail emerges clearly, although more crowded tracks expose the limits of the balanced armature as there is some mashing and loss of detail. There’s no leaking over mids and the good coherence of bass means there is no privileging a single area or having monotonous bass.

Midrange is skewed towards the lower area, with audible emphasis that makes the sound warm and laid back. This enjoyable tuning makes acoustic instruments and voices sound better than trumpets and electric guitars, yet it can reproduce anything without it sounding wrong – some things just sound better than others. The sound is coherent, so everything sounds more or less right – there are no significant oddities going on. Detail retrieval is very good, so the overall impression is that all the instruments are portrayed with many details, although the T5 are not a detail champion and omit the finest details.

I would describe treble as being just a side dish in the signature of the T5. It is in fact really laid back, with enough presence only in the lower area. It then rolls off quite rapidly being barely audible. This reduced treble presence also contributes to the sound appearing warmer and takes a bit of air and sparkle from the sound. Conversely, this reduced presence makes the T5 more appealing to the treble-sensitive folks or to those looking for a more laid-back signature. There’s enough detail for treble to still be enjoyable and to allow the listener to get a grasp of what’s going on.

Tenhz T5 Comparisons

Here’s a small round-up of comparisons:

  • Toneking T4: I sometimes wonder if companies try to make the life of reviewers more complicated by using almost identical names. The T4 are much brighter than the T5, with less bass presence, recessed lower midrange, emphasised upper midrange and emphasised (and almost spiky) treble. Their soundstage also appears comparably larger and they have similar imaging. Their instrument separation is slightly better.
  • Fearless Audio Crystal Pearl: the Crystal Pearl appear similar to the T5 up to a certain extent. Their treble is more prominent and also more extended, with a resulting signature that is brighter. Bass is also more restrained, while midrange is not as warm. In a sense they are more neutral and clearer; they certainly are more sparkling and more suitable for classic rock and similar genres. The Crystal Pearl also have larger soundstage but less accurate imaging, with better instrument separation too.
  • Tin HiFi P1: I regard the P1 as the best-sounding IEM under $300, but that’s because of personal preference. The T4 have more prominent bass which is not as controlled and impactful though, while midrange is less warm and treble is more prominent and extended. All in all the T5 are warmer, but also easier on the ears if you are sensitive to treble; in more than a sense, they sound much more relaxing. They have slightly wider soundstage, but the P1 sound much deeper; imaging is much better on the P1, as is instrument separation.

Final Thoughts

The Tenhz T5 is not one of those IEMs that make you say “wow!”; on the contrary, it is one of those in-ear headphones which you learn to enjoy. That’s because of their laid-back attitude, which comes from a warm(ish) tuning with slightly recessed treble. They are enjoyable irrespective of the genre one chooses, as their tuning is still balanced. They are comfortable too, and they’re well built. They may not be one of those “wow!” IEMs, but they surely are likeable.

About Riccardo Robecchi

Living in Glasgow, Scotland but born and raised near Milan, Italy, I got the passion for music listening as a legacy from my father and my grandfather. I have reported on technology for major Italian publications since 2011.


  1. Thanks for writing such informative reviews Riccardo! I’m relatively new to the hobby but have been exploring IEMs and earbuds in equal measure… So far my highlights are Blon-03 for IEM and VE Zen Lite (closely followed by Monk+ SPC) for earbud.

    I’m curious about how the sound signature of the Tenhz T5 compares to the VE Zen 2.0? After following lots of your reviews I’ve landed on these two as a potential upgrade to my budget earphones but I can’t afford them both!

    Based on my exploits so far, I’m looking for an L-shaped earbud that has great bass but doesn’t have recessed vocals (e.g. not very v-shaped). However, I’m very treble-sensitive so I find even mildly sibilant earphones fatiguing and strongly dislike peaks in the upper-mids (I think people call this “hot/shouty”?). So I prefer a rolled-off treble (e.g. HD650) but if the treble is extended it needs to be smooth and not at all peaky/sibilant. I guess I’m a bit of a basshead and don’t mind some mid-bass bleed, but not a fan of typical V-shaped signature for reasons stated and because I dislike recessed vocals – hence L-shaped and warm/dark tonal preference…

    Putting isolation aside, based on my sound signature preferences do you think I’d prefer the Tenhz T5 or the Zen 2.0? Thanks in advance! 🙂

    1. Hello John,
      Thank you for reading them! I currently don’t have my T5 with me (I recently moved and some stuff got left behind), so a comparison is difficult as I don’t remember their tuning at all. But reconstructing from what I wrote, I think that the Zen 2.0 would be the better match with your preferences. They’re also better from a technical standpoint. If you like the Zen Lite you will probably like the Zen 2.0 even more – the basics are similar, they’re just better on all fronts.
      I hope this helps!

Leave a Reply

Did you like the review? Let me know! Please note that you should write in English, as comments in other languages will be deleted. Thank you!


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.