HiFiMAN HE-560 review: memory maker

HiFiMAN HE-560 review

Everyone has objects they’re closely tied to emotionally. In my case the HiFiMAN HE-560 are headphones that I deem quite special for two reasons: the first is that they are the first high-end headphones I’ve owned, and the second is that they are the last present I received from my late grandfather, the person who initiated me to audiophilia together with my father. He loved the HE-560 as much as I do and we spent many hours together listening to them. You now know that I may not be entirely objective when it comes to these headphones, so you’re warned beforehand. Still, emotional bond or not, I have deemed the HE-560 as among the best-tuned headphones out there for a long time and I still think that.

I’ve received a second pair on loan: these are the new “v4” edition, which uses the new headband design as well as new earcups made of plastic instead of having a wood veneer. There are no sonic differences between the two, as we’ll see later.

Disclaimer: I received my own pair of these headphones as a gift, while the second pair is a loan from HiFiMAN. Additional info is available on the official product page. The v4 is an Adorama exclusive.

TL;DR: recap

+ Light and extremely comfortable

+ Nice design

+ Almost-neutral signature

+ Great technical ability

– Treble can be a bit intense sometimes

– The new version has poor materials and headband

Rating: 9/10

Packaging & Accessories

Packaging is different between the two versions, but I can only show you the new one as the other is (literally) on the other side of the continent. The box is quite simple and only contains the headphones, held by a generous amount of foam covered in satin-like cloth, plus the cable. The old version was a bit more elaborate, as the box was covered in faux leather and had a different opening mechanism, but the contents were the same.

Design & Comfort

HiFiMAN HE-560

The original HiFiMAN HE-560 uses the classic HiFiMAN earcup shape, which is circular, plus the first-generation suspended headband, which has a fixed frame plus a movable headband. The earcups are covered in wood veneer, but everything is made of plastic (excluding the headband frame, which is made of metal). Differently from products by other manufacturers such as Audeze, the wood is just a veneer, which can be seen both as a pro and as a con: on the “pro” side, a veneer doesn’t crack in case you are in a very dry climate and it lasts for longer with less care; on the “con” side, it doesn’t really influence the sound of the headphones nor it does contribute in any way to their structure, plus it doesn’t give you the same feeling of “premiumness” as earcups made of solid wood. In the end it’s just a matter of personal preference. They surely look classy.

HiFiMAN HE-560 v4

The v4 is quite different: although the shape of the earcups is the same, gone is the wood veneer as well as the suspended headband. The earcups are covered in plastic with a metallic finish, while the headband is the same as the one found on the HE-R10P and other recent headphones: it is a traditional headband with a firm padding and a classic extension mechanism. As a redeeming quality, the gimbals on it are made of metal and are therefore not subject to breakage like the ones in the first version.

Build quality is in both cases not stellar, but for different reasons. The first version of the HE-560 became known for the sudden breakage of the gimbal; although the epidemic that everyone knows has since been pinned down to a single batch, there have always been cases of gimbals breaking and HiFiMAN has since launched a replacement gimbal with metal in it to prevent any issues. The new version, on the other hand, has issues with the headband: it creaks with every movement, which is not quite great on headphones costing 900 quid (to put it lightly!).

Both headphones feature so-called “focus pads”, which are angled so that the back is thicker than the front. The part that comes into contact with the head is covered in microfibre (or a similar fabric), whereas the sides are covered in leather (I guess it’s actually faux leather). They’re quite comfortable even if you wear glasses like me.

Speaking of comfort, I’ve long maintained that the HE-560 (in their first version) are the most comfortable headphones out there, at least to my irritation-prone scalp. I can wear them for a whole day and get just a very mild discomfort, whereas doing that with most other headphones would make me feel quite a lot of pain . That’s because of two factors that contribute to this result: on one hand you have the large headband that distributes the weight across a large area and is aided by a bit of soft padding; on the other there is the lateral pressure (or clamping force) that makes it so that the headphones are not kept up just by the force of gravity pushing the headband on your head. The relatively low weight (375 g without the cable) also contributes to the great comfort these headphones offer.

Conversely, the new headband is terrible just as it is on the other headphones with it I’ve reviewed: as the padding is quite stiff and it’s relatively narrow, it is hard to wear the headphones for more than a couple of hours.

Isolation is null, as you can expect from open-back headphones. On the other hand, sound leaking outside is only problematic if you really push the volume, though I still recommend not using the HE-560 in places like public libraries.

The stock cable is quite stiff and prone to coiling, so it’s not the best I’ve seen out there – quite the contrary, actually. It’s still better than the cable used on the R10P, but the competition offers cables that are leagues better than this. The old version uses 2.5 mm jack connectors, while the new one uses 3.5 mm ones; as these connectors are TRS, the HE-560 support balanced connections (with aftermarket cables like the one you see in pictures, made by Venture Electronics). In both cases, the other end has a 6.3 mm jack.

Sound & Specs

I tested the HE-560 using a Topping DX7 and a Drop THX AAA 789, even though over the years I’ve used them with basically any source I’ve ever tried. Music files were mostly FLACs ripped from CDs.

HiFiMAN HE-560

Frequency response 15 – 50,000 Hz
Impedance 45 Ω
Sensitivity 90 dB


With an impedance of 45 Ω and a sensitivity of 90 dB, the HE-560 are among the most difficult to drive headphones out there, with just the HE-6se v2 and a few others being harder. They really require a lot of current to get to high volume levels: they require 23 mW to get to 90 dB and while this may not seem much, this value skyrockets to an astronomical 2.2 W for 110 dB. Granted, you don’t want to reach that volume level unless you are determined to injure yourself, but the HE-560 really is power hungry!

Bass is quite powerful and impactful, but it’s never excessive. It is quite flat and goes down to 20 Hz almost without any bump or dip, which is quite notable (and one of the perk of planar drivers!). Not only is bass quite deep, but it also feels quite rich due to the large amount of details as well as the great layering, which makes it easier for those aforementioned details to come out even in crowded tracks. You could also say, to use other words, that bass is well textured – in this the very good physicality it has helps quite a bit. Speed is remarkable, with transients being very fast: drum hit have that suddenness with a tiny bit of reverb that makes them sound almost real (because, let’s face it, very few headphones can truly recreate something that approximates the real thing).

Midrange is almost neutral, with a small bump in the upper region that gives it a brighter accent. It’s not outright bright per se, it’s more like a slight shift in tonality that makes certain instruments stand out slightly more. I consider the midrange on the HE-560 as one of the best balanced you can find and my favourite to this day, even more than higher-end headphones like the Arya. Detail is, just like with bass, abundant and easily audible even in complex tracks. Physicality is, again, good, though it’s less marked than that of the lows, though speed is identically good.

Treble strikes a great balance and manages to hit the spot between a forward presentation and a relaxed one. Treble sits in the front row and is always clearly audible, possibly even a bit too much sometimes, but it never crosses the line after which it would become excessive and fatiguing. On the contrary, it stays always enjoyable. It’s very clean and polished, with a lot of details that easily shine through. As it is well extended, it also sounds quite airy. Here, too, we can find very good speed with fast transients.

HiFiMAN HE-560 Comparisons

Here are a couple of comparisons with other headphones – only HiFiMAN, at the moment:

  • HiFiMAN HE-560 vs HiFiMAN Arya: the Arya and the HE-560 have very similar frequency responses. The Arya have a somewhat leaner bass which is a tad more more controlled, more detailed and deeper (as it’s more concentrated in the lowest region) but less physical. On the other hand, the HE-560 have warmer mids: although they, too, have quite a bit of brightness, the overall balance is more neutral and therefore a bit warmer; the Arya are more detailed and better at separating instruments. Treble is where the most differences are: although the HE-560 offer plenty of detail, the Arya are a step above in that regard, although their treble is also more emphasised. Soundstage is wider on the Arya but deeper on the HE-560, while imaging is comparable and instrument separation is better on the Arya.
  • HiFiMAN HE-560 vs HiFiMAN Ananda: the Ananda are more bass-light than the HE-560, with less extension and less quantity more in general; the difference is not huge, but it’s noticeable. In terms of detail the two are similar, with the Ananda having a very slight edge, while the HE-560 have more speed and (much) more physicality. Midrange is brighter on the Ananda, both because they have less presence in the lower region and because their upper area is more emphasised; detail is once again similar, with speed being better on the HE-560. Treble is again more emphasised on the Ananda, where it is also a tad more detailed, but it appears to be more extended and airier on the HE-560. Soundstage is wider on the HE-560, which wins the crown in the instrument separation comparison as well, while imaging is a touch better on the Ananda.

Final Thoughts

As I have already mentioned, my opinion of the HiFiMAN HE-560 is inevitably influenced by the experience I’ve had with it and by the memories that are tied to it. I think that’s an inevitable part of using an object for some time. But even ignoring this, the HE-560 emerge as headphones that do almost everything right. Their tonal balance, technical ability and detail are still great to this day, even though the value of headphones has increased in the past few years, making them usually sound better at the same price point.

They may not be perfect, but the HiFiMAN HE-560 still embody my ideal of neutrality. What they lack compared to higher-end models is mostly detail and technical ability, but on all other fronts it’s clear that they are extremely competent headphones. This, together with their unrivalled comfort (in the older version), can really give you endless hours of listening pleasure. They’re true memory makers that have given me many hours of listening pleasure and which will keep on accompanying me in my musical journeys in the years ahead with a sound that never makes me feel tired. They’re a bit of a Proustian madeleine to me as I am sure they are for many others.

In loving memory of Edoardo Robecchi.

About Riccardo Robecchi

Living in Glasgow, Scotland but born and raised near Milan, Italy, I got the passion for music listening as a legacy from my father and my grandfather. I have reported on technology for major Italian publications since 2011.


  1. I really couldn’t disagree more about the build quality on the v4. Beyond the subjectivity of preference for or against a Beyer style headband .. everything about them feels more durable and fitting than my v1.

    The foam on the band is admittedly a bit stiff out of the box, but the springsteel underneath is easy to shape as you see fit, and once properly broken in (try rubber banding them at the yokes around a bowl, or large mug if you don’t feel like going about it organically…. You can even just apply pressure in your hotspot areas for a few minutes a day) it’s delightful for long sessions… Something I’ve never felt for hifiman suspension straps.

    I do worry about the durability of the metallic finish going far forward, but I feel like it’s too early to tell.

    Beyond that I couldn’t agree more. It’s not just your nostalgia… These are wonderful, underrated headphones that represent a fantastic value (their current market price @ adorama being 500 but their actual market value being closer to the 250-300 range…. And hifiman even sells them open box d for 229 which is an unquestionable buy)…all prices usd.

    Truly beautiful sentiment you have for them though. Hope they bring you joy for many years.

  2. Dear Riccardo,
    It would be nice if you didn’t write any more reviews in the future, as they put a huge strain on my bank account. Now I’ve also bought the 560 V4 for 229 USD and it’s extremely close to the HE 6. Not similar in terms of sound, but just as captivating. More in the direction of the HE 1000 V2 with a very, very clean and committed bass, only the mids are even more pleasant with the HE 1000 V2. So you’ve exacerbated my problem that I spend more time selecting headphones than listening to music…
    Otherwise best regards from my banker….

    1. Hello Lars,
      I read the first phrase and I was a bit worried yours would end up being one of the usual aggressive comments… but it really put a smile on my face, so thank you so much! I am glad you are enjoying your HE-560, it really is a keeper. Have a good day!

    2. 1st, the Drop5xx & Deva wired. Then the 560v2 for going on 2 years, winning the majority of listening hours. SennHD600’s (10yr or so) have fallen to 2nd place, but always please until creaky hardware and top band discomfort set in. Thanks for confirming that 560 & V2 are sonically equal. The JDS 3-band EQ & modified Redco dual headphone amp (2.8W/ch @ 8 Ohms) energize the diaphrams. My favorite characteristic of the 560V2 is smooth presentation at exceptionally low playback volume. In my book, the lower – the better. The LDS EQ box is immensely helpful to cope with the huge range of mastering customs which have evolved substantially over the last 70 years of music recording.

  3. Absolutely first class review, and your English is perfect. I think I’m convinced to go out and buy a new pair of 560’s, to replace a pair that my tube amp ate. 🙁

  4. Excellent review, quite a contrast with all those technical articles that read more like a thesis than a review the common man can relate to. I am an engineer and can barely understand some of them myself. Apart from that I am an avid collector of headphones and even though Focal is my favorite brand I have a soft spot for Hifiman when I long for some serious planar joy. All the other brands that make planars are uncomfortable to me, too heavy especially Audeze. Focal phones are very heavy as well but somehow manage to make you forget you have them on. Back to HFM, of which I have a few: HE-X4, HE-400i, Sundara, HE-1000 and HE-6se. All are comfortable, sound fantastic, look like they mean business, and deliver the goods with proper electronics. They can be a tad bit fussy though, especially the HE-1000 and the notoriously inefficient, hard to drive He-6se powered by a Simaudio Moon HA-430 amp/DAC/network receiver that nearly had me take a second mortgage on my house. That amp is astoundingly powerful and the only one I have that do justice to the HS-6se which is a fantastic can once you get to know them intimately so to speak. I prefer them to the much costlier HE-1000, low efficiency has its perks. Unfortunately the HE-560 I enjoyed for a brief period of time moment got stolen along with the suitcase they were in during a flight. Got plucked got right above my head. I liked them so much in fact that I opted to welcome Hifiman phones into my collection numbering 104 pairs. Been collecting since I was a teen in the 70’s.
    Now I’m 58 and still collect, only now I can afford models that were way out of my league as a youth. Plan to acquire a used veneered V1 in a couple days. The guy wanted $150 and I didn’t even think of haggling, they looked brand new, box, third-party quality cable terminated with the tiny 2.5mm plugs. He said he had to buy them online from a Canadian website the name of which escapes me atm. he only paid $40 plus a modest duty (ten bucks iirc) to have them imported into the country since he couldn’t find any suitable ones with miniplugs in the US. Anyway, I can hardly wait to get that stuff on my head and travel to another galaxy lol

  5. 1st, the Drop5xx & Deva wired. Then the 560v2 for going on 2 years, winning the majority of listening hours. SennHD600’s (10yr or so) have fallen to 2nd place, but always please until creaky hardware and top band discomfort set in. Thanks for confirming that 560 & V2 are sonically equal. The JDS 3-band EQ & modified Redco dual headphone amp (2.8W/ch @ 8 Ohms) energize the diaphrams. My favorite characteristic of the 560V2 is smooth presentation at exceptionally low playback volume. In my book, the lower – the better. The LDS EQ box is immensely helpful to cope with the huge range of mastering customs which have evolved substantially over the last 70 years of music recording.

  6. Very nice review. I had this headphone a couple of years ago. Version 1 or 2. I am considering buying It Again. I really like the sound and the Comfort of the older version but it is hard to find. Is the sound really identical between the v2 and the version 4?

Leave a Reply

Did you like the review? Let me know! Please note that you should write in English, as comments in other languages will be deleted. Thank you!


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.